tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7494067943593793251.post2426509118928219393..comments2023-10-01T07:13:07.554-05:00Comments on Hasenpfeffer Incorporated: Your choices are unacceptableHeatherRadishhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15200373266300186422noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7494067943593793251.post-70706212075763286152009-10-22T02:21:09.669-05:002009-10-22T02:21:09.669-05:00Heather Radish: You wrote, "
It took me 15 mi...<b>Heather Radish</b>: You wrote, "<br />It took me 15 minutes to figure out what all those three-digit integers on the beer list meant." Heh. Written like programmer. Where my long ints at?<br /><br /><b>Heather Non-Radish</b>: Let me venture a guess as to why Ms. Radish takes issue with the requirement as I suspect we have similar views on the matter. While the requirement to post calories is a minor infringement on our various liberties, the motivation behind it was not the desire to better inform the public. Rather, it was a desire to keep people from from becoming obese (as measured by BMI, which, as Amy mentioned above, is a poor gauge) and suffering the attendant poor health outcomes. They assumed, incorrectly it turns out, that the reason fast food customers made such unhealthy food choices was due to lack of information. Their solution was to require restaurants to prominently display the nutritional information for their offerings. <br /><br />In other words, the requirement was a means to an end and not an end unto itself.<br /><br />Now that the proponents of the requirement realize that it has not had its intended outcome, it is likely that they will continue to pursue some other, more onerous scheme to ensure their preferred outcome. <br /><br />The infuriating part is that this is all done, if the proponents are to be believed, for own good.<br /><br />P.S. Radish, I'm still waiting to marry you!Gen. Sir Charles Napierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12913060367690268464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7494067943593793251.post-65118466610896228992009-10-14T10:47:37.867-05:002009-10-14T10:47:37.867-05:00I usnderstand that weighing people is extreme, but...I usnderstand that weighing people is extreme, but what is the big deal about having a calorie count on a menu? It helps people make informed decisions about what they put in their body. I don't know about you guys, but I don't want to be overweight. I count calories and protein and I'm not able to pack my own meals everyday. I need that calorie count to help me decide what I'm going to eat.heatherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08558685337815064217noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7494067943593793251.post-71979552472905531502009-10-09T17:47:23.457-05:002009-10-09T17:47:23.457-05:00I totally agree. Didn't some stupid politicia...I totally agree. Didn't some stupid politician in Mississippi or something want restaurants to weigh you before serving you from menus suited to your weight? Because about 95% of people would have to eat grass and water, given how faulty a measure of health the BMI is.<br /><br />They'll get my Grasshopper Fudge frozen custard when they pry it from my cold, dead hands.Amyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02400824933822851881noreply@blogger.com